Employment Law & Compliance

Unfair Dismissal: What UK Employers Need to Know

Understand your legal obligations before dismissing an employee; the two-year qualifying period, automatically unfair dismissal, and the process you must follow

By Ian HarfordUpdated 17 May 202610 min read
Two suited interviewers at a meeting table speaking with a smiling woman opposite, laptop and papers visible

This is not legal advice

This article is for general information only. It is not legal, financial, or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions for your business.

Dismissing an employee is one of the most legally exposed decisions a small business owner can make. Get the process wrong and you face an employment tribunal claim, even if the underlying reason for dismissal was entirely justified.

This guide explains unfair dismissal from the employer's perspective - what the law actually requires, what the two-year qualifying period does and does not protect you from, and the procedural steps you must follow before making any dismissal decision.

The Two-Year Qualifying Period: What It Means and What It Does Not Protect You From

Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employee must currently have at least two years of continuous service before they can bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim against you - though this threshold is set to reduce to six months from 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act 2025. This is the qualifying period most employers are aware of.

What many small business owners misunderstand is what this protection actually means. The two-year threshold applies to ordinary unfair dismissal only. It does not mean you can dismiss a new employee for any reason without consequence. A significant category of dismissals - automatically unfair dismissal - carries no qualifying period at all.

Employees in their first two years also retain full rights in relation to discrimination law, unlawful deduction of wages, and whistleblowing protection. Those claims are separate from unfair dismissal and can be brought from day one.

Automatically Unfair Dismissal: The Categories That Apply From Day One

Certain reasons for dismissal are automatically unfair regardless of how long the employee has worked for you. There is no qualifying period, no minimum service threshold, and no procedural defence. If you dismiss someone for one of these reasons, the employee can go straight to an employment tribunal.

The categories most relevant to small employers include:

  • Pregnancy or maternity leave - dismissing an employee because they are pregnant or have taken, or intend to take, maternity leave

  • Whistleblowing - dismissing an employee for making a protected disclosure.

  • Asserting a statutory right - dismissing an employee for claiming rights they are legally entitled to, such as the national minimum wage or statutory sick pay

  • Trade union membership or activities - dismissing an employee for joining or participating in a trade union

  • Health and safety grounds - dismissing an employee for raising a genuine health and safety concern or refusing unsafe work

  • Part-time or fixed-term status - dismissing an employee for asserting rights related to their working pattern

* A disclosure of information which, in the worker's reasonable belief, is in the public interest and tends to show a criminal offence, breach of a legal obligation, miscarriage of justice, health and safety danger, environmental damage, or concealment of any of these. From 6 April 2026, sexual harassment (as defined in s.26(2) Equality Act 2010) is also expressly included as a qualifying category under s.43B ERA 1996, amended by the Employment Rights Act 2025.

The timing risk

If you dismiss a new employee shortly after they tell you they are pregnant, or shortly after they raise a health and safety concern, an employment tribunal will examine the reason closely.

The burden of proof in automatically unfair dismissal cases is less forgiving than in ordinary claims. Take advice before acting in any situation where the timing of a dismissal could be questioned.

What Makes a Dismissal Fair: The Five Potentially Fair Reasons

For a dismissal to be fair once the qualifying period has been met, you must be able to show both a potentially fair reason for dismissal and that you acted reasonably in treating that reason as sufficient. Having a valid reason is not enough on its own - how you handled the process matters equally.

The five potentially fair reasons under UK employment law are:

  1. Conduct - the employee's behaviour, ranging from a single act of gross misconduct to a pattern of repeated lesser misconduct

  2. Capability - the employee's ability to do the job, including performance issues and long-term ill health

  3. Redundancy - the role is no longer required due to a change in business needs

  4. Statutory illegality - continuing to employ the person would break the law (for example, they have lost the right to work in the UK)

  5. Some other substantial reason (SOSR) - a catch-all category covering genuine business reasons that do not fit the above, such as irreconcilable breakdown of trust and confidence

Most small employer dismissals fall under conduct, capability, or redundancy. The process requirements differ depending on which reason applies.

The Disciplinary Process: What You Must Do Before Dismissing for Conduct or Performance

The ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures sets out the minimum standards you should follow - while not following the Code is not in itself unlawful, employment tribunals must take it into account and may increase or reduce any award by up to 25% where it has been unreasonably ignored before dismissing an employee for conduct or performance. Following this Code is not optional - it is the benchmark a tribunal will use to assess whether you acted reasonably.

The 25% uplift rule

If you fail to follow the ACAS Code without good reason and an employee wins a tribunal claim against you, the tribunal can increase the compensatory award by up to 25 percent if you have unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice (the uplift does not apply to the basic award).

Note that the compensatory award is currently capped at the lower of 52 weeks' gross pay or £123,543, though this cap will be removed from 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act 2025. This applies even if the underlying reason for dismissal was fair. The process matters as much as the reason.

The ACAS Code requires you to follow a clear sequence before making a dismissal decision:

The ACAS Disciplinary Process

Investigate

Carry out a reasonable investigation before taking any formal action. This means gathering relevant evidence, speaking to witnesses, and reviewing documentation. The depth of investigation should reflect the seriousness of the allegation.

Inform in writing

Write to the employee setting out the issue, why it is a concern, and that a formal hearing has been arranged. Give them enough detail to prepare a response.

Hold a hearing

Give the employee the opportunity to put their case at a formal disciplinary hearing. They have the legal right to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative. Listen before you decide.

Decide and confirm in writing

Make your decision after the hearing, not before. Confirm the outcome in writing, including your reasoning. If the outcome is dismissal, state the reason, the notice period, and the final date of employment.

Offer the right of appeal

The employee must be given the right to appeal the decision. The appeal should be heard by a different manager where possible. Confirm the appeal outcome in writing.

For performance issues specifically, dismissal should normally be the final step after a period of managed improvement - documented targets, support offered, review meetings held. Dismissing for poor performance without a formal improvement process is a common reason employers lose tribunal claims they felt confident about.

Redundancy as a Fair Reason for Dismissal: The Process You Must Follow

Redundancy is a genuine fair reason for dismissal - but only when the redundancy is real. You cannot use redundancy as a way to remove an employee you want rid of for a different reason. If the role continues to exist after the person leaves, it is not a genuine redundancy.

When redundancy is genuine, the process you follow determines whether the dismissal is fair. The key requirements for small employers are:

  • Identify the pool for selection fairly - which roles or employees are at risk, and why

  • Apply objective selection criteria - do not select based on personal preference, seniority alone, or factors that could be discriminatory

  • Consult meaningfully - speak to the affected employee before the decision is made, not after. Explain the situation, invite suggestions, and consider alternatives to redundancy

  • Consider suitable alternative roles - if you have any other vacancy that could be offered, you are legally required to consider it before making the person redundant

  • Pay statutory redundancy pay - employees with two or more years of continuous service are entitled to statutory redundancy pay, calculated by age and length of service using a capped weekly pay figure - from 6 April 2026 this cap is £751 per week, giving a maximum payment of £22,530

Collective consultation rules

If you are making 20 or more employees redundant at a single establishment within 90 days, collective consultation rules apply. From 6 April 2026, the maximum protective award for failing to consult doubled to 180 days' pay per employee. From 2027, the Employment Rights Act 2025 will also introduce an additional organisation-wide trigger - the exact threshold is subject to ongoing government consultation.

You must notify the Redundancy Payments Service (RPS) using form HR1 before the first dismissal takes effect - at least 30 days in advance where 20–99 redundancies are proposed, or at least 45 days in advance where 100 or more redundancies are proposed. For small employers making fewer than 20 redundancies, individual consultation is required but the formal collective process does not apply.

What Happens If an Employee Claims Unfair Dismissal

An employee who believes they have been unfairly dismissed an employee who believes they have been unfairly dismissed currently has three months less one day from the date of dismissal to notify ACAS and bring a claim to an employment tribunal - this limit is set to increase to six months from October 2026 under the Employment Rights Act 2025. Before they can submit a claim, they must contact ACAS first under the Early Conciliation process.

The Early Conciliation period lasts up to 12 weeks (doubled from 6 weeks as of 1 December 2025) and pauses ('stops the clock' on) the tribunal limitation period for its duration. After conciliation ends, the claimant has at least one month to file a tribunal claim - a step designed to give both parties the chance to resolve the dispute without going to tribunal.

If the claim proceeds to tribunal, you will be asked to submit a formal response setting out why the dismissal was fair. The tribunal will consider the reason for dismissal, whether you followed a fair process, and whether dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses available to an employer in your position.

Remedies available to a successful claimant include reinstatement (rare in practice), re-engagement, or compensation. Compensation is made up of a basic award (calculated similarly to statutory redundancy pay, up to a current maximum of £22,530) and a compensatory award reflecting actual financial loss. The compensatory award is currently capped at the lower of £123,543 or 52 weeks' gross pay - though this cap will be removed from 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act 2025, after which awards will be uncapped. Both can be adjusted up or down depending on whether the ACAS Code was followed and whether the employee contributed to their own dismissal.

How to Reduce Your Risk: The Documentation That Protects You

Most small employers who lose tribunal claims do not lose because they had the wrong reason for dismissal. They lose because they cannot demonstrate they followed a fair process. Documentation is your primary defence.

The records that matter most in a contested dismissal are straightforward to maintain - but only if you create them at the time, not after the fact.

Documentation to maintain throughout a disciplinary or redundancy process

  • Written records of informal conversations about performance or conduct, including date, attendees, and what was agreed

  • Formal written warnings at each stage, signed and acknowledged

  • Improvement plans with clear targets, timescales, and support offered

  • Invitation letters to disciplinary or redundancy consultation meetings, confirming the right to be accompanied

  • Notes from all formal hearings, ideally taken by a second person

  • Written decision letters with clear reasoning and appeal rights explained

  • Records of any appeal hearing and outcome

  • For redundancy: evidence of the selection pool, criteria applied, consultation meetings, and any alternatives considered

When to take legal advice

If the employee has raised a grievance, made a whistleblowing disclosure, is pregnant, or has recently returned from a protected leave, take employment law advice before you take any disciplinary action. These are the situations where automatically unfair dismissal risk is highest and where getting the process wrong can be most costly.

Unfair dismissal law is genuinely complex. The framework above gives you a working understanding of the obligations that apply - but contested dismissals, situations involving protected characteristics, and cases involving senior employees benefit from specialist employment law advice before you act. The cost of getting it right upfront is substantially lower than the cost of a tribunal claim.

Get Practical Guidance You Can Use This Week

Get Practical Guidance You Can Use This Week

Ready to cut through the noise? Join the BGE newsletter for practical guidance, tool recommendations, and real-world insights for UK founders and business owners - delivered weekly to your inbox. No fluff, no spam, unsubscribe any time.

BGE newsletter

Frequently asked questions

What is unfair dismissal?

Unfair dismissal is one of the most significant employment law risks that UK employers face, yet many founders have only a vague understanding of what it means, when it applies, and what the consequences of a successful claim can be. Understanding the basics of unfair dismissal protection is essential for any employer who may at some point need to end an employment relationship.
Unfair dismissal is the legal right of qualifying employees to challenge a dismissal they consider unjust or improperly handled at an employment tribunal. To dismiss fairly, an employer must have a fair reason — which the law recognises as including capability, conduct, redundancy, statutory restriction, or some other substantial reason — and must have followed a fair and reasonable procedure in reaching and implementing that decision. Both the reason and the process must be fair.
The qualifying period for unfair dismissal protection is set by law and may change, so the current threshold should be confirmed rather than assumed. Certain dismissals — such as those related to whistleblowing, pregnancy, or trade union activity — are automatically unfair from day one. Our guide to unfair dismissal for UK employers covers what fair dismissal looks like and how to manage the process correctly.

What is a disciplinary procedure?

Handling employee performance and conduct issues is one of the most challenging aspects of people management for founders, particularly those without HR experience. A disciplinary procedure is the structured process through which employers address these issues — and following it correctly is not optional. Both the fairness of any eventual dismissal and the employer's ability to defend an employment claim depend on it.
A disciplinary procedure sets out the steps an employer will follow when addressing concerns about an employee's conduct or performance. It typically involves an investigation, a formal meeting at which the employee can be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative, a decision with a clear written outcome, and the right of appeal. The ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures provides the standard framework that employment tribunals will consider when assessing whether a process was fair.
A failure to follow a fair disciplinary process is one of the most common reasons a dismissal becomes unfair — the employee does not need to be guilty of gross misconduct if the process was flawed. Having a written disciplinary policy and applying it consistently reduces both the risk of claims and the difficulty of managing them. Our guide to disciplinary procedures for UK employers covers the key steps involved.

What is a protected conversation?

There are situations where an employer wants to have a frank conversation with an employee about ending their employment — perhaps due to performance concerns, a change in business direction, or a mutual recognition that the role is not working — without that conversation being used as evidence in a subsequent employment claim. A protected conversation is the legal mechanism that can, in certain circumstances, allow this.
A protected conversation — sometimes referred to as an off-the-record conversation — is a pre-termination negotiation between an employer and an employee about ending the employment on agreed terms. Under the Employment Rights Act, the contents of such a conversation are inadmissible in an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, provided the conversation was not accompanied by improper behaviour such as harassment, discrimination, or undue pressure. The protection does not apply to automatically unfair dismissal claims.
Protected conversations are a useful tool in specific circumstances but are not appropriate for all situations — the protection is narrower than many employers assume, and the conditions that must be met require care. Seeking employment law advice before initiating such a conversation is strongly recommended. Our guide to protected conversations covers when they are appropriate and how to conduct them correctly.

What is a settlement agreement?

When an employer and employee agree to end an employment relationship on mutually agreed terms — typically involving some form of financial payment in exchange for the employee waiving their rights to bring certain employment claims — the document that records this agreement is a settlement agreement. Understanding what it is and when it is used helps founders engage with employment lawyers and HR advisers more effectively.
A settlement agreement is a legally binding contract between employer and employee that sets out the terms on which employment is ending or has ended. It typically includes the payment being made, a waiver of specified employment claims, any agreed reference wording, and confidentiality provisions. For a settlement agreement to be legally valid, the employee must receive independent legal advice on its terms before signing — a requirement that the employer usually funds.
Settlement agreements are used in a range of circumstances — ending an employment where there is a dispute, managing an exit where both parties want a clean break, or resolving a grievance or disciplinary process. They are not appropriate for every employment ending and should not substitute for a fair process. Our guide to settlement agreements for UK employers covers when they are appropriate and what the process involves.

What is redundancy?

Redundancy is one of the fair reasons for dismissal in UK employment law, but it is also one of the most frequently misused — both by employers who use it to avoid dealing with performance issues and those who carry out the process incorrectly. Understanding what redundancy means in legal terms and what a compliant process looks like is important for any employer who may need to reduce headcount.
Redundancy in UK law occurs when a business closes, a specific workplace closes, or the requirement for employees to do a particular kind of work diminishes or ceases. It is not a catch-all mechanism — if the role will be filled by someone else doing the same work, that is not redundancy. Employees with a qualifying length of service who are made redundant are entitled to statutory redundancy pay, calculated according to a formula based on age, length of service, and weekly pay.
A redundancy process must be conducted fairly — including proper consultation with the affected employee before a final decision is made, genuine consideration of alternatives, and a fair selection process if not all employees in a group are being made redundant. Failing to follow a fair process can make an otherwise valid redundancy into an unfair dismissal. Our guide to redundancy for UK employers covers the process step by step.

Get the Business Growth Engine newsletter

Practical analysis, delivered weekly.

Ian Harford

Ian Harford

FCIM Cmktr

Connect with Ian on:

Ian Harford FCIM CMktr is co-founder of GTi Business Systems Ltd and a Chartered Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Marketing. He writes practical UK business guidance for founders and SME owners.